Wednesday, May 31, 2006

In defence of reservation

Usually I avoid topics where everyone has already gotten into it and sparks fly around. No use stirring the same broth. But I notice one issue that's going around in many blogs (I blog-hop to new blogs all the time) and everyone seems to have the same opinion and that too one which I do not share. It is the burning reservation issue that's rocking the country. In my opinion from my perch afar, I think that the violent protests are confined to the North of Vindhyas, while token protests simmer in the south. In the blog world I notice there is a near unanimity in that reservations are harmful. I can't help a cynical thought that the chance of coming to any physical harm being slim has made the bloggers write their true opinions. No offence intended, but in the place where I hail from, Tamilnadu, speaking against reservation publicly is taboo and is inviting danger. In fact I was astonished when some years ago agitations against the Mandal committee recommendations broke out in North India. Anyway what I feel is anyone blindly against the reservation system doesn't understand the reason how it actually has helped the country, and the politicians and the jingoistic nincompoops who show themselves as the protectors of the oppressed don't help a bit in this.

There is a sound economic rationale behind the system of reservation. Here I am not talking about the reservation system in its present form. In its present form it is actually making everyone forget the reason for its being and is harming the real downtrodden. The per-capita income of our country at the time of our independence, as everyone knows was not at the present levels even adjusting to the inflation and occasional devaluations. The peculiar feature about it was that the per capita income varied with communities and skewed in favour of the "forward" communities, the Brahmins. Simply put Brahmins as a class had far higher levels of income while the communities who came into the Scheduled Castes list had abysmal income levels. In order to increase a country's per capita income, it is not enough to merely increase jobs and schools. It would have been a generic band-aid solution and certainly not one which would cure the malaise. It is easy to declare that in this country everyone is equal. Bitter it may be though, it must be realized that centuries of caste-based oppression has stunted the growth and psyche of the humiliated and kept-servile people. It was simply not a level playing field out there at the beginning.

Just opening more and more schools would not increase literacy. The very success of the noon-meals scheme is a reminder to this stark reality. A family where every new addition is another mouth to feed and hence its capability to earn, however fragile the body maybe, simply cannot be spared and provided the luxury of education, is the norm among the historically downtrodden. Just because education is accessible to say, a poor farmer's child and a middle class child it doesn't mean that both would get schooling. Harsh realities of life stand in the way of the less-affluent child. It is common sense that apart from school, the family situation, its environment and even the vocabulary of the parents play a great role in empowering the child. So certain steps designed to uplift the children, the community and thus the nation, have to be accepted and are inevitable. Country's progress is team-work, the pie is limited and the weaker links have to be nourished enough to strengthen the whole team.

Here individual poverty is not an issue. That cuts through communities. But repression of an entire class of people is a sad but very true history. That ails the country's economy and any prescription has to take in consideration the nature of illness to effect a cure. Individual poverty can be (and must be) addressed through merit scholarships.

Unfortunately, the reservation system was viewed as a god-send for unscrupulous political parties. They used the reservation system to create vote-banks. This became a tool to create and support vote-banks enmasse. Every political leader wanted to bring one community or the other into the list. It assured the leader the eternal gratitude and support of the community. At least that's what the leaders believed. With everything, one can go only so far. In their greed and intense competition of vote-bank politics, insanity and unbridled casteism played a role. A sort of reverse-snobbery prevailed with communities rushing in to declare themselves oppressed and backward. In fact many political leaders do not have a genuine interest in educating the downtrodden. The more uneducated the people are, the more rock-solid the vote bank is. This was amply exposed when the issue of creamy layer among the backward communities came about. More on that later.

Even Mahatma Gandhi hoped for a future where reservation won't be needed and every community would be in equal footing. He naively assumed that in 50 years it would be achieved. What he didn't foresee was how this economic upliftment tool would turn into a contraption of political leverage.

So the medicine has actually aggravated the illness and its side-effects have proved to be a detriment to the whole body of the nation. It was mainly because the medicine of reservation was administered recklessly and without proper thought given to it.

My two-cents worth recommendations:
1. The concept of creamy layer should be imposed. The affluent families from the backward communities should be made to compete on par with others.

2. A family who has availed the reservation for three successive generations should be excluded from the reservation process. This measure is because such families actually hinder other families of the same community to prosper

3. Nationwide merit scholarships should be instituted. This should be regardless of the community.

4. A national database should be created containing the families and persons who avail reservations and the communities who lag behind in availing the benefit. In future this would facilitate tailoring the system towards the actual needs and also would help in designing out-reach programmes targeting communities that are not utilizing the opportunities available to them.

I feel even our PM and President skirt around the issue. They advocate creation of more seats everywhere. I seriously doubt whether our country's infrastructure has the wherewithal to support that. It's a mere gimmick, however well-intended it may be, I feel.

For the people out there who would like to know my roots, I am a Brahmin by birth. And I didn't get enough marks in my school finals to get an engineering or medical seat on merit. Of course, no quotas for my community meant I was deprived of those exalted streams of education. That's one way of putting that despite an educated lineage I am a dull-head. Do I deserve reservation? Even I don't think so.


P.S: I am aware that I have not provided statistics supporting any of my arguments. It is merely because that I don't have the time and access to get them. I am lazy as well. All the same, I assure that my hypotheses would stand the test of factual scrutiny.

11 comments:

M (tread softly upon) said...

I made it a point not to say anything on the reservation issue, partly because someone somewhere has said it all. Honestly the thing that irks me is that reservation provides for those people who may not be necessarily deprived. We had a few sudents in our class in Med school who got in not by merit but by their last name and the quota although they were from the best schools in Cal. That is not a deprived student and he had no right to get into Med school with a low score on the competitive exam while more deserving students were left out just because they were not SC/ST! That to me is discrimination.

Me too said...

I have always wondered if there are FCs supporting reservation and anyone from the rest against!

Your points are good. But as you've said, when the intention of these schemes have gone beyond helping the needy but mere vote-banks, IMO, seems hopeless!

totti said...

But, why start at higher level of education. I think there was a point that a poor farmer's child can't go to school because of several restrictions.Isn't that partly because of insufficient infrastructure at lower education?

Why throw them directly at such a competitive level where i have seen a few of my friends just drop out? The whole thing looks like another loophole, a chance to exploit.

Anarkist said...

I totally agree that SC and ST's deserve the reservations and everything should be done to uplift the opressed. But, the present agitation is not against the SC/ST's, its against the OBC's. OBC's were never as oppressed as the SC/ST's and clubbing them together in the same argument is ridiculous. See my comment on 0.5's blog.

Has to be me said...

Ur suggestions r good but I still stick to my stand! :)

I feel reservation issue is probably justified @ the school level & that also like u said to the deserving/needy candidates esp the financially backward ones.

(PS - There r many Brahmins who r not financially well to do as well)

And again @ the professional level, the needy can be given preferences but they shd have a certain amt of calibre in them for the schedule course. I mean u cant have a dumb doctor! Maybe if the normal cut-off is say 95% a person with 90% can still be considered if he falls under the financially backward quota.

I would support such a cause & not by religion. The world is moving ahead.....trying to become one.....y do we need to discriminate each other in the name of religion?

At the global level we talk abt racism & try to prevent racial discrimination. But in our own country why these different segments?

I feel these r small issues which in large wud contribute to the violence amongst the various religions/castes.

Point 5 said...

I still don't think financial demarcation makes sense, cos as I have already mentioned a rich kid with illiterate parents is no better than a poor kid with highly educated parents.

Three generations restriction might be a good idea..but what conditions ie qualifications of parents should be applied as a criteria ??

The government is yet to publish census of OBC..some claim 52%, some claim 36%...Is it fair to have a 27% reservation for 36% of population ??

More than the reservation policy, what irks me is the total lack of clarity of the politicians.....if this is not vote bank politics, what is it ?

Sidewinder said...

hmmm...

Consider this.....Leave alone the economic status of the upper castes or lower caste.

Just get the statistics of illiteracy among lower caste people.Find out how many brahmins/uppercaste people in our country are illiterate ? You will get a fair picture...

There is huge protest against reservations and no one is supporting it because those who need reservations doesnt even know what is going on. That is the truth. :)

Reservations is not the best solution but at this present moment we dont have any other good solution than this.

Jinguchakka said...

@m - I understand you. But misuse of a provision should not be a reason for its removal. Rather it should be put to proper use.

@me too - the darn politicians!

@totti - Every good thing can be abused. And I agree even at elementary level there is a malaise. But that shouldn't mean at higher levels concessions shouldn't be there.

@anarkist - I read your comment on 0.5's blog even before I decided to write on this. well, there are even instances of OBCs themselves oppressing the SC/STs. But to an extent reservation for them too, is justified. Agreed, in this category, the politicians play the most.

@has-to-be-me - Please have an open mind. Also economic hardship and social oppression are entirely different things. That is why I point out reservation and merit scholarships separately. You talk about the issue in global level? Even in US affirmation policy is followed to uplift Afro-Americans. They do it even in the private sector!!


@pointy - The criteria should be that the first generation should not have their forefathers avail of the reservation. Be they rich or poor should not matter at this stage. But I guess we have crossed this level atleast in Urban India, and hence the creamy layer exclusion has gained relevance.
I agree with you in that politics has given reservation a bad name.

@sidewinder - Reservation is the viable solution.

Viewer said...

New post buddy

EYE said...

I agree with the bit that at the time of independence numerous castes were poor and uneducated and for their upliftment it as essential that reservations be introduced but now in 2006, it is high time lifted the reserves. Pure comptetion on the basis of merit ought to exist in atleast some institutions. And considering that caste reserves are nothing but playgrounds of politics, it is better they are no longer encouraged.
India is not the same as it was 57 years ago. Today there are numerous organisations public and private working to improve the condition of the masses. education is not something that is unheard of in any part of the country. So it's time to say goodbye to caste reservations.

Mythreyee said...

cudnt agree wid u more. actually, me thinks dat NO reservation shud b made based on caste. i think it shud b solely based on family income. iv seen dozens of ppl who r sposed 2 b BCs or SCs or STs or watevr but bein filthy rich n above all, pretty intelligent. so here i am, prob weighin lesser on a financial scale n mebbe a lil more on d intelligence scale, but dese oder ppl get better opps dan me! now in wich way is dis fair?! simply NOT fair.

i do think reservation dats solely based upon financial status wud b very effective. but of coz it shud b carried out in a foolproof way. i spose any1 can create a fake salary cert dese days...